Ned Davis Distills Political Angst Into ‘Big MAC’ Equity Trade

Wall Street loves few things more than a good acronym to describe a trading thesis. Think FANG, FOMO/YOLO and TACO.

Now Ed Clissold wants to coin a new moniker. He’s calling it the Big MAC trade, a play on Big Midterms Are Coming. The chief US strategist at Ned Davis Research is aiming to capture what he thinks will be the main theme of 2026: the policy implications in the runup to and fallout from this fall’s Congressional vote.

President Donald Trump’s flurry of quasi-policy proclamations to start the year — fired off mostly on social media, with virtually zero legislative clout behind them — reveal his focus on improving the Republican party’s political fortunes in November. The president is keying on what the chattering classes have distilled to America’s “affordability problem.”

The implications for the stock market may well be profound. Take the past week. Trump sent bank stocks into a tailspin after demanding credit card issuers cap interest at 10%, not even half the current average. Military contractors took a hit when the president demanded they halt dividends and invest in production. And much of Wall Street shuddered Monday after the latest administration attack on the independence of the Federal Reserve.

“President Trump’s focus on affordability heading into midterm elections has led to a series of actions targeting oil prices, mortgage rates, credit card rates, and the fed funds rate,” Clissold said.

The clearest risks, he said, are to the financial sector, with actions targeting mortgages, credit cards and overall interest rates. Indeed, Big MAC is more of a theme than a specific trading strategy for risk-conscious investors: “industry-specific policy action is a risk heading into midterms,” Clissold wrote. It’s not obvious how to manage that risk.

Government policy “chaos” is an additional risk to markets in 2026, said Sevens Report founder Tom Essaye. He worries that the muted reaction to many of Trump’s latest attempts to rewrite economic and business policies may be sending a signal that the market is neutral on the nuts and bolts.

“This is a risk we need to monitor going forward because the lack of market reaction to this policy uncertainty seems to be emboldening the administration,” he wrote Monday.

“At some point, uncertainty will take a toll and while we’re not there yet, we are getting closer,” Essaye said.