Markets Have Evolved. So Should the SEC's Disclosure Rules

Decades of “regulatory creep” and onerous disclosure requirements have discouraged companies from going public, say leaders of the Securities and Exchange Commission. To revitalize American markets, they plan to pare back those demands, especially for smaller firms. “We need a reset,” Chairman Paul Atkins recently declared.

Although this narrative has a certain appeal, the SEC risks misdiagnosing the problem it’s trying to solve — and hence overlooking more pressing concerns.

There’s no question that US markets have changed dramatically since Atkins first served on the commission’s staff in the 1990s. Total equity value has more than doubled as a percentage of gross domestic product, but there are some 40% fewer stocks. Today’s initial public offering candidates are often larger and more mature, with some already valued at tens of billions of dollars — or, in the case of Elon Musk’s conglomerate, more than $1 trillion. Increasingly, the market is made up of a smaller number of bigger companies.

BB Bigger

It’s tempting to blame regulation for this dynamic. Expanding disclosures on topics as diverse as conflict minerals, cybersecurity and executive compensation have caused the average length of annual 10-K filings to nearly triple since 1996, making them harder to read and costlier to prepare. That in turn has conferred an advantage on bigger companies with more compliance staff. As Atkins said in a speech in December, “the path to public ownership has become narrower, costlier and overly burdened with rules.”

His proposed solution: Limit disclosures to those deemed financially material and let more firms qualify for the tailored rules reserved for the smallest ones.