Passive Aggressive: Bogle’s Warning Came True

Michael LebowitzAdvisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those of Advisor Perspectives.

Since the pandemic, the line between aggressive speculation and passive investing has blurred. The current bout of speculative fervor extends beyond financial markets. For instance, we see the same impulse in the explosion of sports betting and the surge in event-betting sites like Kalshi and Polymarket.

In the investment arena, margin debt is at record highs (as shown below), and zero-day-to-expiry (0DTE) stock options now account for approximately 50% of all options volume. Furthermore, the number of leveraged ETFs and their trading volumes have risen sharply. To that end, we share a quote from The Kobeissi Letter:

There are now a record 108 long and 31 short tech-related leveraged ETFs, 139 in total. This is 3 TIMES more than the 2nd largest sector, financials, with 47 total funds. By comparison, Consumer Discretionary has 44 ETFs, while Communication Services has 34 ETFs. In other words, tech has more leveraged ETFs than the next 3 sectors COMBINED.

While not as easy to quantify as margin debt or sports betting, this aggressive speculative behavior is showing up in passive securities. It is most visible, in the fierce rotations between sector and factor ETFs.

In this article, we explore how this speculative environment and the aggressive trading in passive ETFs are playing out. We also examine how to identify and capitalize on sector and factor rotations, turning passive investors' aggressive behavior into an opportunity.