Puerto Rico's Title III Bankruptcy: Initial Views and Expectations

Puerto Rico last week declared a form of bankruptcy under Title III of the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (PROMESA) after a stay on litigation expired and negotiations with creditors broke down. In many ways these filings may mark “the end of the beginning” (as Churchill once said) of this chapter for Puerto Rico, as the commonwealth moves to write down a majority of its roughly $73 billion of financial debt. While consensual restructurings are still possible for some classes of claims, Title III is the fastest means to usher Puerto Rico into the next phase of its credit cycle: recovery.

Impact on muni markets

PIMCO sold the last of its Puerto Rico government debt from municipal-focused client portfolios in 2013.1 We believed then that the property rights on the island’s bonds were inadequate and that pensions might be prioritized above debt in distress. In addition, we held a view that a federal intervention would be necessary in the event of a default (using the auto industry bailouts during the global financial crisis as a guide for what might happen to creditors). We do see pockets of opportunity in select revenue bonds and have added a small amount of Puerto Rico enterprise debt to municipal high yield portfolios (but remain void of Puerto Rico primary government debt).

Here are some of our initial takeaways:

Puerto Rico’s Title III filing is an idiosyncratic event that will not have an impact on the broader municipal market. PROMESA has no application to U.S. states, and we do not foresee any state seeking a financial debt restructuring. In addition, the macroeconomic issues contributing to Puerto Rico’s crisis are not in evidence on a similar scale elsewhere in the U.S. municipal market.

However, Puerto Rico’s experience does reinforce an important theme for municipal bond investors, learned during the Detroit bankruptcy: GO bonds are not immune if an issuer suffers financial distress, and they may be subject to impairment absent a statutory lien. This insight is among several reasons why PIMCO municipal portfolios continue to favor larger relative allocations to essential-service revenue bonds, which contain security features that we view as more defensible in a bankruptcy. We note that defaults of municipal bonds have been uncommon historically, especially relative to corporate debt (see Figure 1).

Haircuts on aggregate primary government debt, including GO bonds and COFINA bonds, will likely be more severe than what current market prices imply. We would have expected a larger drop in bond prices year-to-date considering the PROMESA Financial Oversight and Management Board announced a “once-and-done” approach to addressing Puerto Rico’s fiscal difficulties. Investors should bear in mind that the 10-year fiscal plan certified by the board projects that cash flow available for debt service will cover less than 25% of the scheduled amount due, even if fiscal measures are successful. And while the board is responsible for filing a restructuring plan, it will likely allow the government to craft the initial proposal. This puts creditors at a disadvantage because they may not propose alternative plans.