Across the Line

Highlights from last month

Geopolitical developments, including a historic walk across a line, continued to make headlines in April. In a tit-for-tat sequence, the U.S. and China announced a series of retaliations that many feared could descend into a trade war: China’s Ministry of Commerce responded to previously announced levies on imports of steel and aluminum as well as Section 301 tariffs from the U.S. with additional duties on American products. President Donald Trump then rattled markets by calling for additional tariffs on Chinese goods worth $100 billion, and China later imposed an antidumping deposit on U.S.-grown sorghum. Trade tensions subsided, however, following reports that U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin would travel to Beijing to discuss the dispute. In a sign of moderating tensions on the Korean peninsula, Kim Jong-un became the first North Korean leader to cross into the South Korea-controlled side of the border to attend a summit hosted by President Moon Jae-in. The one-day summit concluded in a joint statement calling for a peace treaty and continued dialogue on denuclearization, setting the stage for upcoming U.S.-North Korea discussions. In Syria, conflict continued to escalate: The U.S., U.K. and France fired a barrage of missiles at military targets inside the country following an alleged chemical weapons attack by the Assad regime. The U.S. also followed with stiff sanctions against Russia for “malign activity,” including its support of President Bashar al-Assad and involvement in the civil war.

Central bank rhetoric appeared to diverge as economic data were more mixed. According to minutes from the Federal Reserve’s March meeting, several officials cited a stronger economic outlook and greater confidence in inflation meeting the 2% target as justification for a slightly steeper interest rate path. Signs of rising inflation were supported by a Labor Department report showing that private-sector wages and salaries increased 2.9% from a year earlier. However, first quarter real GDP growth slowed to an annualized 2.3%, below the nearly 3% recent trend but better than consensus expectations. In contrast to the Fed’s upbeat tone, the Bank of Canada, European Central Bank and Bank of England (BOE) all stressed caution in their economic outlooks, focusing on downside risks as growth slowed, particularly in Europe. BOE Governor Mark Carney’s cautious comments poured cold water on expectations for a May rate hike, causing the British pound to weaken. The IMF also provided mixed guidance on global growth, forecasting a cyclical upswing in 2018−2019 but citing growing downside risks due to trade tensions, tightening financial conditions and geopolitical pressures.

The U.S. 10-year Treasury yield briefly crossed the 3% mark in April. The yield last crossed the 3% threshold in early 2014, then more than halved to 1.4% in mid-2016, only to double by 2018. Solid growth trends and rising inflation contributed to the 21-basis-point climb in the U.S. 10-year yield over the month. In contrast, rate moves in Germany, Japan and the U.K. were relatively subdued. In commodity markets, crude oil added inflationary pressure, with the price for Brent rising 7% on the month and ending above $75 a barrel. The U.S. dollar gained against most developed and emerging market counterparts. A 9% drop in the Russian ruble in response to U.S. trade sanctions led the decline in emerging market currencies; the Brazilian real also fell nearly 6%. Developed market equity indexes ended in slightly positive territory, as investors shrugged off trade jitters in early April. Notably, the energy sector1 returned over 9% on the month alongside resurgent crude oil prices.

Chart 1

Taking the Long View
The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield garnered much attention in April when it flirted with the headline-grabbing 3% threshold. While round numbers can be of psychological importance to investors, the more tangible consideration is what rising rates mean for fixed income portfolios. While increases in rates can be painful in the short term – since bond prices move inversely to yields – they have proven to be beneficial to fixed income portfolios over a longer period. Looking at the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, a proxy for core bonds, the chart shows historical average annual returns over three years based on the starting yield of the index. Today’s starting yield is 3.3%; the chart shows that when the starting yield was in the 3%–4% range, bonds have historically returned over 4.5% − more than a full percentage point higher than when yields were in the 2.5%–3.0% range. For investors, then, higher rates should be welcome in the long run.