Tariffs Make Industries Less Competitive

Back in May of 2024, we wrote a weekly commentary called: “We Can’t Import Cheap Homes; But We Could Import Cheap EV Cars.” In that weekly we argued that since the U.S. auto industry, does not want to build small cars because it is not competitive, then we should open the lower-end EV automobile industry to imports from China. The weekly was in response to former President Biden’s tariff on Chinese EV imports of 100%. The measure also included a 50% tariff on solar cells, and a 25% tariff on electric vehicle batteries, critical minerals, steel, aluminum, etc.

Our argument was based on the fact that our automobile industry was not competitive in small cars (sedans) and had pivoted to the production of large, and very expensive, ‘light trucks.’ Many of these light trucks are gas-guzzling vehicles that are probably only driven in U.S. markets but are not very competitive in other continents. This means that it is very difficult to export them to other countries. More recently, in our February 7, 2025, weekly, which we titled “Fiscal Revenues from Tariffs? We Have Been There Before!,” we talked about a tariff provision we have had since the 1960’s ‘Chicken War,’ which has been called the ‘Chicken Tax,’ a 25% tariff on imported light trucks.

light truck sales

Although there are other reasons for our automobile industry’s tilt towards the production of ‘light trucks,’ we will argue in this weekly that one of the biggest reasons for the tilt (see graph on the previous page) has been as a consequence of the Chicken Tax, that is, the imposition of the 25% tax on the importation of light trucks.1 We argue that the U.S. automobile industry lost its desire to compete in the small passenger car market and concentrated on the production of those automobile segments where the US government provided protection to sustain higher profits over the long run. And, of course, these higher profits were possible due to the shield provided by the Chicken Tax.2