The Market Crash – Hope In The Fear

Last week, we noted that “nothing good happens below the 200-DMA,” and the tariff-induced market crash this past week confirmed that statement. However, we also noted that over the last 30 years, previous failures at the 200-DMA have also often been buying opportunities. That is unless some “event” of magnitude creates a massive shift in analysts’ estimates.

“For this chart, I label “bear markets” as periods when the market fails the 200-DMA and repeatedly fails subsequent retests of that moving average. If the market fails at the 200-DMA and recovers shortly thereafter, it is considered a “correction.” As shown, during the first two “bear markets,” earnings fell sharply as the economy slowed and a recession took hold. Outside the brief “Covid” pandemic, earnings remain well anchored to ongoing economic growth. If the current failure at the 200-DMA is the beginning of a deeper market correction, we should see earnings estimates beginning to fall more quickly.”

S&P 500 large cap

The question is whether the “tariffs” are an event that causes a massive negative revision to earnings and/or the onset of a credit-related crisis or recession. The answer to that question is critically important to today’s analysis: Was last week’s market crash a buying or selling opportunity?

The answer to that question is complex as we work with many unknowns.

  • How will consumers respond to the impact of tariffs on their consumption?
  • How will the companies respond to the impact of tariffs on their production and investment?
  • But also, how will companies respond to the change in consumer demand?
  • Most importantly, and the only thing that matters, is the impact on corporate earnings.

There is undoubtedly a very bearish case to be made from the overly draconian tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. The impact of higher costs on goods and services will lead to demand destruction by producers and consumers, leading to drastically lower economic growth rates. That impact should not be dismissed, as it has everything to do with earnings and whether or not the market crash is near its end. We can model out a couple of assumptions.

Let’s assume that Wall Street analysts are correct. In response to the tariffs, they revised their earnings estimates downward. For example, Goldman Sachs reduced its S&P 500 earnings growth forecast from 7% to 3% for 2025, citing the adverse effects of increased tariffs on economic growth and corporate profitability. As we know, economic growth rates and earnings have a very high correlation. If Wall Street analysts are correct, a slow-growth economic environment of 1% this year would allow earnings to grow near their long-term trend.

annual percent change

However, note the periods when earnings deviate from underlying economic activity. Those periods are due to pre- or post-recession earnings fluctuations. Therefore, assuming the market crash is a warning of an impending recession, we might consider 2020 as a model for potential outcomes. Given we are shutting down the economy, we can assume a -1% real GDP growth rate and a 4% decline in earnings.

annual % change