Pyrrhic Victory: Sacrificing Pretax Returns at the Altar of Realized Losses

The uncertainty around US tariff policy has significantly increased US equity volatility. Although Parametric had anticipated increased volatility in 2025, nobody knows where the market is headed next. In uncertain times like these, investors are justifiably looking for the tax benefits that loss harvesting can deliver.

Maximizing after-tax return is a key goal of direct indexing, but so is tracking the benchmark. Here’s why we think it would be a pyrrhic victory to let risk management suffer in pursuit of realized losses.

Balancing two objectives

Direct indexing has a dual mandate of seeking to provide pretax performance similar to the benchmark while aiming to outperform on an after-tax basis. We recognize that reaching for more losses can result in greater pretax return differences, yet managing risk too tightly can diminish the ability to capture losses.

To strike a balance between these competing goals, Parametric monitors portfolios daily with trigger-based loss harvesting and simultaneously employs risk controls every time a portfolio trades. At the end of the day, a direct index portfolio is a beta strategy, and clients are seeking index-like returns.

In pursuit of losses

A direct index strategy is often selected for the potential tax benefits it seeks to provide. We would argue that systematic loss harvesting and the resulting capital losses could be the silver lining to volatile periods such as the one we’re in. However, some investors may worry that their portfolio isn’t taking full advantage of the opportunities the market presents.