Money Supply Growth: A Thesis With A Fatal Flaw

Recently, MarketWatch ran a provocative headline: “When the world’s largest asset manager and the Bond King both agree: Run to gold, silver, and bitcoin.” The article highlighted how Larry Fink’s BlackRock and Jeffrey Gundlach, often dubbed the “Bond King,” see deficits and “money printing” as reasons for investors to escape fiat currencies and pile into hard assets. As Gundlach put it:

“Deficits are out of control, the government is printing too much money, and the dollar is destined to decline.”

With a similar refrain, Larry Fink noted that “hard assets are one of the few places left to preserve wealth.”

At first glance, it sounds persuasive. After all, the U.S. is running record deficits, high debt levels, and the Federal Reserve recently cut interest rates, adding to fears of renewed money supply growth. However, a closer look at the fundamentals of modern money creation and the role of government deficits reveals that this thesis is too simplistic. Basic economics suggests a different conclusion: money supply growth is primarily a reflection of economic growth, government deficits actually contribute to private-sector savings, and gold’s price remains tethered to the dollar and real interest rates, which means a dollar rally could easily derail the “hard asset” trade.

In other words, while the thesis makes for a bold headline, it misses the underlying mechanics driving prosperity and asset prices.

Let’s dig into this topic further and start with money supply growth.