Not All Price Drops Are The Same

In this video, Chuck Carnevale — co-founder of FAST Graphs and known as “Mr. Valuation” — explains why investors must look beyond short-term market reactions and focus instead on the intrinsic value of the businesses they own. Using two recent case studies, FMC Corporation and Fiserv, he illustrates how price and fundamentals interact — and why “not all price drops are the same.”

The Psychology of Price Drops

Chuck begins by reminding viewers that investors tend to be about two-and-a-half times more sensitive to fear than to greed. When stocks are expensive, investors often ignore the overvaluation. But when prices fall, panic sets in and emotion takes over. His goal is to re-center investors on fundamentals — earnings, cash flow, and valuation — rather than short-term price swings.

FAST Graphs, he notes, visually connects price to a company’s operating results over time. The orange “earnings justified” line represents the business’s intrinsic value, while the black price line shows how the market values it. When those diverge, opportunity or risk emerges.

Case Study 1: FMC Corporation — A True Fundamental Collapse

The first example, FMC Corporation, illustrates a fundamentally driven price decline.
FMC Corp

FMC, a cyclical fertilizer and agricultural chemical company, had enjoyed years of solid earnings growth until recent troubles hit. Its adjusted operating earnings fell steadily over the past four to five years, including a 50% earnings collapse in 2023, followed by additional declines expected in 2024–2026. Free cash flow turned sharply negative, and the company was forced to slash its dividend from $2.32 to $0.32 per share to preserve cash.

Behind these numbers was a series of operational and leadership setbacks. The CEO, Mark Douglas, departed after the board lost confidence in his direction. FMC also recorded a $500 million write-down on its India business, part of a wider restructuring that included job cuts, asset sales, and factory closures. Analysts badly missed their earnings estimates for two consecutive years, showing just how quickly the company’s fundamentals deteriorated.

Despite this, the stock’s decline far exceeded the earnings collapse. From its peak, FMC lost nearly 90% of its market value, even though earnings fell roughly 70%. Chuck points out that while fundamentals clearly justified much of the drop, fear and sentiment drove it to extreme lows.