Fed Signals A Dovish Tilt and Market Rotation

The Fed delivered what I would describe as a dovish version of the “hawkish cut” and the market’s reaction since then has confirmed that interpretation. Chair Powell did not pre-commit to additional easing, but almost everything surrounding the decision—his tone on inflation, his acknowledgment of labor market softness, and an underappreciated shift on the balance sheet—tilted clearly in a more accommodative direction. Equity markets heard that message immediately, with the S&P 500 and Dow moving to new highs and market leadership began to subtly change.

What I consider the surprising headline of this meeting is the effective end of quantitative tightening and a sooner-than-expected resumption on buying bills to create reserves. The Fed’s decision to begin buying Treasury bills, roughly $40 billion per month, may be framed as a technical reserve-management operation rather than QE, but in practice it halts QT and adds liquidity at the margin. For markets that have been quietly worried about reserve scarcity and funding stress, this was a very important signal. The Fed is once again erring on the side of ample liquidity, and that has historically been supportive for risk assets.

Even more important was Powell’s conceptual shift on inflation. For months I’ve argued that tariffs represent a one-time price-level adjustment, not a persistent inflationary force. This was the first press conference where the Fed chair echoed that view so explicitly. Powell emphasized that inflation pressures are concentrated in tariff-affected goods rather than services, and that much of that impulse is already behind us. He repeatedly referenced TIPS break evens as evidence that inflation expectations remain well anchored. That matters enormously. When the Fed stops treating every price shock as the beginning of a new inflation regime, the bar for restrictive policy falls.

The labor market discussion was striking. Powell essentially acknowledged that payroll data have been overstated by roughly 60,000 jobs per month due to distortions in the birth-death model. If you take that seriously, the last three months of reported job gains are effectively negative. That aligns with what I’ve been calling the “no-hire, no-fire” economy—firms are reluctant to lay off workers, but they are not adding aggressively either. The Fed is forecasting unemployment around 4.4–4.5%, and we are beginning to see early signs consistent with that path. Jobless claims jumped sharply the day after the meeting, reminding us how volatile the data can be, but that is a series we now need to watch carefully for confirmation rather than noise.

Putting these pieces together—the end of QT, a softer inflation framework, and growing recognition of labor market cooling—the direction for short-term rates remains clear. I continue to believe the Fed funds rate belongs in the low 3s, with roughly a 100-basis-point spread to the 10-Year Treasury. With the 10-Year hovering around 4.1–4.3%, that implies another 50 basis points of easing ahead. The timing will be data-dependent, but the destination has not changed.