Top Takeaways from Oaktree’s Quarterly Letters – December 2025 Edition

In the current installment of The Roundup,1 Oaktree experts explore the need for renewed vigilance in the direct lending market, discuss the future of private credit in Europe, identify the evolution of the high yield bond market, and reflect on the backdrop for emerging markets equities. Plus, we’ve included an excerpt from one of Howard Marks’s recent memos.

Howard Marks

1. Market Outlook: Systemic or Systematic?

The well-publicized credit episodes of the last few months aren’t an indictment of the whole sub-investment grade debt market, or the whole private credit market. Rather, they’re just a reminder that the yield spreads people care about so much are there for a reason: because sub-investment grade debt entails credit risk. And thus a reminder that credit skills are always a necessity for debt investors . . . even if the need for those skills isn’t apparent in good times.

When times have been good for a while, the possibility of loss recedes from consciousness. Investors’ risk tolerance grows, and they tend to focus less on due diligence and more on bidding aggressively for deals. The result is a lowering of standards.

Nowadays, I’m often asked whether the recent episodes in sub-investment grade credit are “systemic.” In other words, are they “pertaining to the system” or “affecting the system,” as opposed to idiosyncratic occurrences that don’t say anything about the system. For an example of something systemic, consider the counterparty risk that arose during the Global Financial Crisis. Because financial institutions had entered into hedging transactions with each other, one bank’s weakness weakened the others, impacting the system overall.

I don’t think today’s issues are systemic in the sense that there’s something wrong with the lending system, or that they will trigger other defaults and lead to a breakdown of the system. In simpler words, there’s nothing wrong with the plumbing. But imprudent loans and business frauds often occur in clusters for the simple reason that people who make investments and loans are highly prone to error in good times. Investors and lenders are supposed to be risk-averse and thus exercise discipline and vigilance, but sometimes they fail in this regard. This isn’t part of the plumbing of the financial system but rather a regularly recurring behavioral phenomenon. So, it isn’t “systemic,” but it is “systematic.”

We’ve lived through generally good times in the last 16 years. The coming period is likely to be more “interesting,” as errors that were made in those good times come to light. On the other hand, the recent credit events have probably chastened lenders and investors, putting them on alert. Thus, they’re likely to incorporate a re-elevated level of prudence in their decisions in the coming months and perhaps years. This would be a positive development.