Taming the Hidden Hazard to Core Equity Returns

When investors think about risk in equity portfolios, the usual suspects come to mind: market risk, sector risk or maybe even macroeconomic risk. But lurking beneath the surface is a less obvious, often underestimated threat—style and factor risk.

In today’s rapidly shifting markets, such unintended tilts can quietly undermine long-term returns, adding volatility without delivering consistent rewards. For core equity allocations, we believe actively reducing these risks is essential to keep an investment strategy on course.

What Are Factor and Style Risks and Why Do They Matter?

Factor and style risks refer to the exposure a portfolio has to systematic factors—like value, growth, momentum or low volatility. While some style tilts are deliberate, many creep in unintentionally, even in “core” equity allocations meant to be style neutral. The problem? Style and factors go in and out of favor, sometimes violently, and portfolios with hidden tilts can get whipsawed by these rotations.

Recent market history has made style risk harder to ignore. Three trends stand out:

1. Factor and Style Volatility Is Rising

Factor volatility can be measured by looking at how much an equity factor’s returns swing relative to the market. Our research shows that the annualized volatility of momentum, growth, value and low-volatility factors has risen substantially since the COVID-19 pandemic (Display). That means an unintentional tilt in a portfolio can introduce more risk than in the past.

Equity factors

2. Rotations Are Getting Faster

Not only are style factors more volatile, but leadership among them changes more frequently than in the past (Display). Over the last five years, style performance has changed direction every 233 days on average, compared to every 796 days between 2010 and 2015. What worked last year (or last quarter) may lag badly the next.

Timing market inflection points is extremely difficult in normal market conditions. In the past, it may have seemed easier as investors could ride a sustained period of style outperformance that often lasted years. Now, with rotations happening faster than ever, we think trying to time style exposures or rely on past winners is an even dicier strategy that’s nearly impossible to execute and can have negative tax consequences.