The Shift to Outcome-Driven ETFs

The start of a new year often sharpens investor priorities. Now after several years of uneven growth, shifting rate expectations and wide dispersion across markets, 2026 has begun with renewed urgency around a familiar question: What do we want our portfolios to do for us now?

It’s a question being asked at scale. In 2025 alone, global exchange-traded funds (ETFs) attracted roughly US$2.24 trillion in net inflows, setting records not just for flows, but also trading volumes and new launches.1 This growth highlights how firmly ETFs have established themselves as a primary vehicle for portfolio change—driven by evolving market conditions and a growing demand for clearer investment outcomes. As assets continue to concentrate in the ETF wrapper, the more revealing story is no longer whether investors are using ETFs, but how they are using them.

Long valued for liquidity, transparency and ease of implementation, ETFs are increasingly being deployed with greater precision as portfolio construction shifts from access to intention. Alongside continued interest in actively managed ETFs, thematic investing has also gained traction. With this, we also see renewed appreciation for systematic, rules-based equity strategies—often designed not simply to track markets, but to shape the outcome experience.

In our view, aligning thematic exposure with specific goals or factors can help mitigate any over-correlation and better express investor objectives with greater clarity and discipline.

Innovation in index design has meaningfully expanded what rules-based strategies can deliver, enabling investors to move beyond simple market exposure toward more intentional, outcome-aware portfolio construction. Whether the objective is smoother volatility, stronger risk-adjusted returns, enhanced income, or targeted factor and sector exposure, multifactor ETFs can be well-suited as deliberate portfolio tools for core asset allocation. Importantly, these approaches offer a level of discipline and transparency that can be difficult to maintain through discretionary decision-making, particularly during periods of heightened market dispersion.

This shift is especially evident in equity smart beta ETFs. In the fourth quarter of 2025, global net inflows for such US-listed funds reached just over US$69 billion, up about 41% from the prior quarter.2 This was the largest quarter-over-quarter increase recorded during the year and the culmination of progressively stronger gains earlier in 2025. Notably, investors showed strong demand for international dividend ETFs, led by foreign large-cap value strategies, and reflecting a preference for income, valuation support and diversification outside the United States.3 We believe this underscores the growing investor appetite for rules-based equity strategies that tilt portfolios toward specific factors rather than broad market exposure.

We are also seeing broader investor focus on addressing enduring portfolio challenges—such as concentration risk and drawdown sensitivity—through systematic design rather than reactive positioning.