Liability-Driven Investment Strategies for Corporate Pensions in 2026

Benchmark index total returns in 2025

With better funded ratios, we might expect to see greater interest in Pension Risk Transfers (PRT), consistent with the trend we’ve observed in the past. Based on the data available through the third quarter, however, the 2025 numbers appear to buck that trend. According to LIMRA, corporate pension buyouts were less than half of the prior year in each of the first three quarters of 2025. Depending on fourth quarter numbers, last year’s total could be the lowest amount of PRT activity since 2016.

LIMRA pension buyout sales in 2025 on track to reversing long-term trend through Q3

Avoiding past mistakes in pension management

Pensions have been here before and made mistakes that ended up costing them for years. How can we help them avoid the mistakes of the past?

Worth noting going forward is the reduction in buyouts, which has commonly been attributed to an increase in lawsuits brought forth by plan participants who contend that their benefits have been replaced at lower value though PRT annuity purchases. The argument is that PRT is akin to forcing a trade from an investment grade bond to a high yield bond that has the same cash flows but is less valuable.

Many of the lawsuits have been dismissed, and the Department of Labor (DOL) has recently filed briefs in several cases supporting annuity purchases. As other lawsuits progress through the courts, plan sponsors may want to consider whether they want to take on the risk of being tied up in litigation.

We could make additional arguments for hesitating with buyouts. The termination process takes time and effort, with the end result remaining uncertain until completion. In a volatile world, other matters might take precedence over this type of project. Unless the plan is fully terminated, the plan sponsor would still have a plan to manage—and that could be harder with fewer assets and more volatile liabilities. In other words, unanticipated problems may surface.

Investment strategies have been developed over the last couple of decades that can potentially lead to more efficient funding risk mitigation. A well-funded plan may be relatively easy to operate with good, transparent investment management, requiring little effort and less risk to the sponsoring organization over a long period. If there’s no harm in waiting, why rush into a buyout?

Buyout or no buyout, we think the most important thing to do with a pension surplus is avoid losing it. We’ve seen more than enough examples of well-funded plans becoming poorly funded to have learned that lesson. We believe plan sponsors should endeavor to invest intelligently and know every risk they are taking—not allowing themselves to be fooled by solutions that could expose the plan to new and unknowable basis risk.

Applying LDI strategies may help eliminate the possibility of falling below full funding by investing in assets that aim to behave in line with liabilities. Once a framework is in place that seeks to mitigate downside risk, then plan sponsors may take whatever risk they can accept to grow the surplus further. Unless the plan is open and expanding, and asset growth is needed to offset future accruals, then surplus growth can be secondary to maintaining full funding.

Seeking to mitigate pension funding risk

Markets giveth, and they taketh away. During past episodes of market turmoil—Tech Bubble, Global Financial Crisis and Sovereign Debt Crisis—pension funding was severely damaged to the point that many sponsors closed, froze or terminated their plans. Underfunding has been weighing on corporations’ financials for more than 20 years. But markets in recent years have provided a gift of full funding to most of those plans. How should sponsors respond?

We think the answer, above all else, is to avoid the mistake of letting full funding slip away. Most plans have indeed learned to manage their investments prudently, implementing more appropriate investment strategies using LDI that have allowed for the current level of funding. In recent years, many plans have chosen to offload all or part of plan liabilities to insurance companies to reduce the influence of pension liabilities on financial statements. As we’ve seen, that trend has slowed, at least temporarily, for good reasons.

The bottom line

With sensible strategies that have been developed over the last two decades, we believe a well-funded plan may continue for many years with little risk to the plan sponsor. The strategies require transparency and customization to help limit downside outcomes by investing in LDI assets that behave in line with pension liabilities. Now sponsors may lock an attractive lower bound and avoid unnecessary basis mismatches between assets and liabilities. Then they can try to grow the surplus, of course, but only as a secondary consideration to preserving a minimum funded status.

A message from Advisor Perspectives and VettaFi: Discover something new! Click here to register for our upcoming webcasts.

The views expressed in these posts are those of the authors and are current only through the date stated. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and Parametric and its affiliates disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions for Parametric are based on many factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Parametric strategy. The discussion herein is general in nature and is provided for informational purposes only. There is no guarantee as to its accuracy or completeness. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. All investments are subject to the risk of loss. Prospective investors should consult with a tax or legal advisor before making any investment decision. Please refer to the Disclosure page on our website for important information about investments and risks.

Investment advisory services offered through Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC ("Parametric"), an investment advisor registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (CRD #114310). Parametric is also registered as a portfolio manager with the securities regulatory authorities in certain provinces of Canada (National Registration Database No. 42850) with regard to specific products and strategies. Parametric provides advisory services directly to institutional investors and indirectly to individual investors through financial intermediaries. The information on this website does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to purchase, securities in any jurisdiction to any person to whom it is not lawful to make such an offer. Investing entails risks, and there can be no assurance that Parametric (and its affiliates) will achieve profits or avoid incurring losses. All investments are subject to potential loss of principal. Parametric does not provide tax or legal advice. Prospective investors should consult with a tax or legal advisor before making any investment decision. Please refer to the disclosure page for important information about investments and risks.

S&P Dow Jones Indices are a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC (“S&P DJI”) and have been licensed for use. S&P^® indexes are registered trademarks of S&P DJI; Dow Jones^® is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC (“Dow Jones”); S&P DJI, Dow Jones, and their respective affiliates do not sponsor, endorse, sell, or promote Parametric and its strategies, will not have any liability with respect thereto, and do not have any liability for any errors, omissions, or interruptions of the S&P Dow Jones Indices.

©2026 Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC. All rights reserved. 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2800, Seattle, WA 98104.

NOT FDIC INSURED. OFFER NOT A BANK GUARANTEE. MAY LOSE VALUE. NOT INSURED BY ANY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY. NOT A DEPOSIT.

© Parametric

Read more commentaries by Parametric