There is No AI Apocalypse

The recent report by Citrini Research paints a frightening future of massive AI- induced unemployment, crashing stock markets, rising default rates, and a general descent into economic chaos.

But such a prediction has no historical or economic basis. Let us envision the following scenario. Assume that AI enables every worker to double his or her productivity, in other words, to be able to produce twice the output (automobiles, reports, deliveries, customer service, etc.) than they do currently.

In such a world, all the goods and services that are produced today in a 5-day work week could be produced in half the time. If workers and firms cut back their hours by 50% (in other words, move to a 2 ½-day workweek), the same total output of the economy would be produced that is produced today. In this scenario, the average real hourly wage would double, since the same quantity of goods and services are produced in half the time. This conclusion is supported by both theory and historical evidence that increases in productivity lead to increases in real wages: double productivity and real wages will double.

In this scenario, most workers would want to take advantage of their higher wages to expand their income and raise their lifestyle. If workers toil just one more day a week (from 2 ½ to 3 ½ days), their real income will increase by 40%. In our $30 trillion economy, this extra day of work would produce $12 trillion of extra goods, services, and income. Workers would use their expanded purchasing power to buy better housing, transportation, schools, improved government services, and increase their leisure and travel experiences enabled by the vast expansion of their free time (recall, weekends are now 3 ½, instead of 2 days).

Critics of AI focus on the white-collar workers whose specific task might be eliminated by AI. But most white-collar jobs rely on the worker’s general intelligence, diligence, and discipline. These skills can be readily transferred to the industries that will expand because of the surge of workers’ incomes.