And the Winner Is… Robotics (Again)

With 2026 now in full swing, it’s time to announce the global podium for robotics — brought to you by the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index (ROBO). Cue cinematic, suspenseful music. Presenter: “And the winner for the last decade of robotics is… China! Ending 2024 with more than six times the installation of industrial robots as second-place Japan and eight times that of the third-place U.S. The numbers remain equally impressive when we look at the operational stock, where this year’s winner’s two million robots represent 43% of all global stock. Impressive work by the Asian giant.”

It won’t surprise you to hear that this year hasn’t seen an Oscar-style global event for robotics. But if it had, it would have gone just like that. And when the camera panned across the other competitors, both the U.S. and Japan, while politely applauding, would have worn the expressions of rivals who don’t want a repeat of this. China may have won this overly forced and confused metaphor, but the race for the next one is on.

Earlier in the year, we discussed how robotics is poised to benefit from the AI race, and argued that however much AI ends up reshaping the economy, robots would be instrumental to what the future looks like. This time around, we take a look at another race from which robotics is likely to benefit: geopolitics.

The Drone Warning: A Cautionary Tale

Unlike drones — which, before becoming ubiquitous in areas like defense, agriculture, and industrial inspection, were mainly seen as toys — humanoids are promising great things even before they are widely deployed. A few among the many uses being touted for the technology: a new level of factory automation and a key to solving the challenges that come with the aging demographics.

Other powers do not want a repeat of what happened with drones, where China became a world leader before the truly useful aspects of the technologies were discovered.

As recently highlighted in a whitepaper by the Association for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI), the U.S. is witnessing the exact same set of circumstances play out in advanced robotics that previously hobbled its leadership in the small drone sector. Just as it did with drones, China’s government has designated robotics a national strategic priority, mobilizing massive state resources, aggressive subsidies, and coordinated industrial policy to scale domestic champions and dump products onto the global market.

In the drone market, this sustained dumping and a fragmented U.S. policy response resulted in overwhelming China dominance, the rapid erosion of American manufacturing capacity, and a dangerous long-term dependence on adversary-linked supply chains. But robotics is fundamentally different. This technology is vastly larger, highly capital-intensive, and deeply embedded across the entire industrial and defense base. If the U.S. allows a repeat of the drone market in advanced robotics, the economic and security damage could be far more impactful and costly to reverse.