Gold Tanking During a Crisis? We've Seen This Pattern Before

Many people are flummoxed by gold’s deep correction over the last two weeks. Given there’s a war on, shouldn’t gold be catching a strong safe-haven bid?

In fact, the pattern playing out in the gold market isn't out of character. We saw similar dynamics in the early days of the 2008 financial crisis and the pandemic.

As I’ve already reported, the historical pattern since the 1980s suggests that, beyond an initial safe-haven bump, a war alone doesn’t seem to significantly impact the trajectory of gold prices. As wars drag on, other factors tend to drive the market – particularly monetary policy.

This has proved true so far in the Iran conflict. After initially surging to $5,400 an ounce at the onset of hostilities, gold quickly corrected as worries about inflation and higher interest rates drove the price down.

World Gold Council analysts say there are several dynamics weighing on gold, led by inflation concerns.

“Sharply higher real yields and expectations that policy rates will now rise in 2026, alongside de‑leveraging and profit‑taking, have all weighed on sentiment.”

Many people believe the Fed will be forced to hold rates higher for longer to deal with an oil price shock and inflation surge. The World Gold Council noted that “The oil market disruption and the Fed’s hawkish stance further cooled investors’ hopes on future cuts, pushing up yields and leading to accelerating global gold ETF outflows, mainly from U.S. funds.

I agree that interest rate worries will likely create continued headwinds for gold. However, the markets seem to be ignoring the giant Debt Black Hole and the shaky nature of the economy. An oil shock would not only cause prices to rise more generally, but it could also be the pin that pricks the debt-riddled bubble economy. In that situation, the Fed would almost certainly pivot to looser monetary policy – not tighter.

The World Gold Council also acknowledged that political and economic realities may tie the central banker’s hands.

“Any signs of the Strait of Hormuz reopening – alleviating energy disruptions - could rebuild investor confidence. On the flip side, prolonged disruptions could lead to intensifying expectations of rate hikes – though political constraints and the mounting debt burden in the U.S. may limit the Fed’s room to raise.”