Geopolitical Risk, Commodities and Core Portfolio Resilience

In environments of geopolitical stress, diversification* is tested, and investors may need to think more wholistically about the assets included in their portfolio.

Diversification is supposed to be an investor’s first line of defense. The logic is familiar: If stocks provide growth, and bonds provide stability, then together they should help a portfolio weather most market environments.

But that relationship has never been guaranteed, and the escalation of hostilities in the Middle East is a timely reminder. As geopolitical tensions rose, markets quickly focused on the risk of disrupted energy flows, higher oil prices and a broader stagflationary impulse. We’ve seen that an oil story is rarely just about oil, and a sustained energy shock tends to reshape the entire macroeconomic backdrop—increasing the odds that stocks and bonds move together again.

Historically, one asset class that has behaved differently during geopolitical stress is commodities. The case for commodities is about owning a diversified basket of raw materials—not just oil—that may respond to global economic and geopolitical shifts unlike traditional assets.

Limits of the traditional core portfolio

The military conflict with Iran illustrates how quickly geopolitical events can ripple through financial markets. Fighting in the Middle East immediately raised concerns about global energy supply—particularly around critical transit points such as the Strait of Hormuz. Oil prices may have reacted first, but the economic effects don’t stop there.

Higher energy prices can push inflation higher while simultaneously weighing on economic growth—a combination commonly referred to as stagflation. When that happens, the traditional relationship between stocks and bonds can break down.

Historically, the negative correlation between equities and bonds depends on a relatively stable macro environment where growth and inflation move together. When growth accelerates, inflation often rises modestly, and equities perform well while bonds weaken.

But oil shocks may disrupt that dynamic by pushing inflation higher while slowing economic activity—a potential shift that markets have begun to fear in recent weeks. Rising energy prices tied to geopolitical instability have increased the risk of both slower growth and higher inflation, raising the possibility that stocks and bonds could once again move in the same direction.

We already see evidence of this dynamic. As the Iran conflict intensified, both equity and bond prices declined in unison, eroding the protective role fixed income has typically played in a diversified portfolio.

Percentage change in US equities and bonds since the Iran conflict began

For investors relying exclusively on stocks and bonds, this scenario poses a serious threat. If both assets struggle simultaneously, the portfolio loses its primary source of diversification. This is where we think commodities could enter the discussion.