Fed Weighs Stubborn Inflation and Middle East Conflict

Investor anxieties surrounding negotiations between the U.S. and Iran paused a rally on Friday, initially sparked by roughly in-line inflation data and the announcement of a two-week ceasefire on Tuesday night. Even so, the S&P 500 capped off its best week since November—despite losing momentum after a seven-day advance—while West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil managed to end the week below $100 a barrel for the first time since late March even as the Strait of Hormuz remained largely closed heading into the weekend.

Oil prices began to reverse their previous decline, however, as negotiations reached a deadlock over the weekend, with Vice President JD Vance stating that the talks failed because Iran would not agree to permanently halt its nuclear weapons development. Following the failure of the talks, President Donald Trump announced a U.S. naval blockade of all Iranian ports and the Strait of Hormuz, set to begin on Monday. WTI crude oil jumped above $101 per barrel, while International Brent rose above $100 a barrel as energy markets digested the impending blockade. The S&P 500 remained little changed in early Monday trading, however, as investors hoped that the U.S. and Iran would eventually reach a deal.

As the geopolitical backdrop remains in a state of uncertainty, last week’s batch of economic data—containing evidence of heightened, stubborn inflation and a drop in consumer sentiment—highlights a delicate balancing act. As we look at the broader economy, we are seeing a juxtaposition of sticky inflation, continued labor market concerns and questions about future economic growth, underscoring a growing dilemma for the Federal Reserve as it attempts to calculate all of these risks in its approach to interest rates.

Front and center last week were two major inflation reports: the February Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index and the March Consumer Price Index (CPI). Overall, the PCE report paints a picture of heightened, persistent inflationary risks that were present even before the overseas conflict escalated in March. Most notably, Core PCE—the U.S. Central Bank’s preferred measure of inflation—held stubbornly at 0.4 percent for a second consecutive month. This places the year-over-year measure at 3 percent, remaining above the Fed’s 2 percent target. In fact, we haven't seen overall progress toward that 2 percent goal since inflation first hit 3.1 percent in December 2023.

The March CPI report, issued later in the week, showed a month-over-month increase of 0.9 percent, induced by the recent energy shock. Core inflation, however, only rose by a tepid 0.2 percent, while services inflation pulled back to its lowest on a year-over-year basis since March 2021. While this comes a positive development in an overall better than expected report, there are still signs that inflation pressures remain. For example, supercore services (excluding shelter), a reading the Fed uses to gauge future services inflation, increased by just 0.18 percent in March. This follows steeper gains in the supercore category over the past few months, which, when combined with the most recent reading, show likely upward service-sector pressures ahead.

Additionally, the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Services Index, released last week, showed a spike in prices paid by service firms to 70.7, the highest level reached since October 2022. This has a correlation with service-sector inflation and points to likely continued inflation pressures in the coming months, especially when combined with the ISM manufacturing index released the week prior, which showed prices paid by manufacturing firms spiking to the highest level since June 2022. Once again, the Fed finds itself in a challenging position. It must determine whether the recent conflict is causing a transitory surge in energy prices that will subside or if it will leak into core inflation and permanently alter consumer expectations. The risk here is that if consumers and corporations expect inflation to be permanent, their actions could create a self-fulfilling prophecy, much like the economic environment of 1966–1982. Often referred to as the Great Inflation, rising inflation expectations during this period led people to act in ways that guaranteed higher prices, from wage–price spirals to feeble attempts by consumers to front-run inflation, a surge in demand that only pushed prices higher.