Are Markets Complacent?

In a recent (unscientific) Franklin Templeton social media poll, we asked investors what they felt was the biggest risk to the global economy over the next 12 months. Nearly half (45%) of respondents highlighted high oil prices as their greatest fear factor. A bursting of an artificial-intelligence (AI) bubble or private-credit defaults lagged significantly behind in their list worries.

We saw a similar response earlier this month when we polled our firm’s chief investment officers (CIOs). They agreed that high oil prices pose the chief risk to the global economy and financial markets in 2026.

This month, Brent and West Texas Intermediate crude oil prices have become stuck around US$100/barrel, up nearly 40% from their pre-war levels. Prices of various distillates, including diesel and jet aircraft fuels, are up 60% or even more. The Strait of Hormuz remains effectively closed, meaning that physical stocks of crude oil, liquified natural gas, and distillates could be depleted in parts of Asia or Europe within months. And given both the damage to production in the Persian Gulf region, as well as the lead times between production, transportation and delivery (estimated at three months or longer), a scramble for short supplies later this year may be unavoidable.

And yet over the past few weeks global equity markets have rebounded sharply, overcoming their war-related setbacks in March. Credit spreads, the euro and other asset prices have also snapped back. Markets appear to be shrugging their collective shoulders.

Read more: Fed Chair Confirmation Hearing: A Lot of Noise, Few New Signals

What’s going on? Are markets complacent with the risks identified by our clients and our CIOs? Or are there fundamental reasons behind the markets’ recoveries?