Why Are Stocks So Resilient? Earnings!

The Big Question

Since early April, U.S. stocks have rallied sharply despite an ongoing war, rising inflation fueled by soaring oil prices (near $100/barrel), higher bond yields (up 0.6 to 0.7 percentage points), and frothy valuations (21 times projected earnings vs. a historical average of 17 times for the S&P 500 Index).

That combination seems like a clear negative for markets. So why are equities still rising? The answer is a combination of how today’s stock market is constructed, strong earnings momentum, and structural changes in the economy.

Market Composition

The S&P 500 today looks very different than it did in the past. Technology is now one of the largest sectors, with a small number of very large companies driving a significant share of returns. These companies have higher-than-average profit margins and are less tied to physical input costs such as oil prices.

The chart below shows just how complete the transition has been. In 1980, the Energy sector made up roughly 28% of the S&P 500—Exxon was the largest company in America and oil supermajors dominated the index.

Today, Energy is just ~3% while Information Technology has risen from ~4% to ~32%. The two sectors crossed around 1995 and have diverged consistently since. Including Communication Services (Alphabet, Meta, Netflix—reclassified out of IT in 2018), the broader “tech complex” is closer to 40% of the index. Adding Amazon, a Consumer Discretionary stock, would raise the number even higher. This composition shift explains why the market is structurally less sensitive to oil shocks than in prior cycles: the index’s largest constituents now sell software, advertising, and cloud services with minimal physical input costs.

It also helps explain why higher valuations may be justified. An index dominated by growth technology companies with fat profit margins should demand a higher price than one dominated by slower growing energy, industrial, or consumer staples stocks. NVIDIA’s growth trajectory has more potential than Exxon’s.