Asking the More Appropriate Question

“Would I be better off waiting for the Fed to make its move on rates before investing?” “Should I wait to increase duration because a blocked Strait of Hormuz could push oil prices higher and push rates even higher?” “Should I invest in bonds gradually to reduce the risk of missing the rate peak?”

These are questions we hear on a regular basis and are reasonable questions. However, they may place too much emphasis on short-term rate forecasting and not enough emphasis on the purpose of the fixed income allocation.

Market timing is usually better suited to tactical investing, where the goal is to capture quick total return from price appreciation. That approach may be more appropriate for the growth-oriented side of a portfolio, where investors are already accepting higher volatility in pursuit of higher returns. Fixed income, by contrast, is often used more strategically: to provide income, reduce portfolio volatility, support principal preservation, and create more predictable cash flows.

For that reason, the key question is not always, “Can I invest at the exact peak in rates?” A more practical question is, “Can I lock in a suitable income stream from high-quality bonds that supports my long-term plan?”

Interest rate cycles can be long, and identifying the peak in real time may be more a matter of chance than precision. Investors are limited by the rate environment available when they put money to work. When an investor is ready to invest, it may be dictated by uncontrollable circumstances as well as their stage in life. As the chart illustrates, from 2005 through 2020, the 10-year Treasury averaged approximately 2.85%. Over the last three years, it has averaged approximately 4.24%. That difference matters. In lower-rate environments, investors often reach for additional risk to generate income, which can work against the role fixed income is intended to play in a portfolio.

10 year treasury

Read more: Market Focus Shifts From Earnings to Macro Catalysts