Eight Takeaways from the Supreme Court’s Tariff Ruling

1. Short-term stimulus jolt. Though mostly expected, the U.S. economy, key U.S. trading partners, and corporate America just found out they are getting a short-term stimulus boost. IEEPA had been used for an estimated roughly half of the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. While the precise amounts are unclear, countries and companies will now play less. An overall U.S. tariff rate that had been expected in the low teens just a few months ago is now unlikely to reach double-digits, even after new replacement tariffs are imposed under different legal authority.
2. Intermediate-term effects are likely to be minimal. President Trump already revealed his tariff pivot, from IEEPA to Section 122 (which allows for 15% tariffs for 150 days) and Section 301 (which takes several months to investigate). LPL Research believes most of the IEEPA tariffs can be replaced by summertime (Evercore ISI’s policy research team believes 90% of tariffs could potentially be restored).
3. Trade policy uncertainty remains. While companies paying smaller tariffs is positive for profit margins and the Supreme Court ruling offers more clarity on the future path of tariffs, a lot of uncertainty remains. Markets will continue to debate whether lower courts will force the Treasury to issue refunds. In addition, it’s not clear what this decision means for trade negotiations and completed trade frameworks with other countries (notably, given the USMCA, this news doesn’t mean as much for imports from Canada and Mexico).
4. Inflation impact is murky. If tariffs have not affected inflation much on the way in, then it follows that they won’t affect prices much coming out. So, while benefits to inflation will likely be minimal, taking a point or two away from expectations for where tariff rates will eventually land can reasonably be expected to lower inflation by a few basis points.
5. Don’t expect Fed rate cut expectations to move much. The removal of tariffs reduces a source of friction in the real economy. Tariffs were expected to raise input costs, tighten profit margins, and weigh a bit on economic growth — slowing economic conditions are generally supportive for Treasuries. With that drag removed, growth may stabilize at the margin, and inflationary pressures embedded in the bond market could ease faster than markets previously expected. This changes the balance of risks around the Fed’s rate path and may lead to some modest repricing of rate cut expectations and incremental U.S. dollar weakness.
6. We would fade the stock market bounce in tariff losers. Given tariffs are already in the process of coming back in with President Trump’s announcement of a new 10% global tariff (that didn’t take long), we wouldn’t chase any rebounds in import-heavy consumer retailers. Given mixed post-decision reactions in retailers in Friday’s trading, it appears the market is onboard with this assessment. Among tariff losers, our preference would be to play homebuilders, industrials, and technology hardware/semiconductors over apparel retailers and automakers.
7. Treasury may face additional short-term funding pressure. For the Treasury market, this trade policy shift removes a meaningful — though not dominant — support to federal revenues and reopens questions about funding pressures at a time when deficits were already poised to remain in excess of $1.8 trillion annually. With less tariff income, the Treasury may need to increase issuance modestly, particularly in bills and shorter ‑dated notes, to offset the lost cash flow. This could put upward pressure on yields at the margin, especially in an environment where supply and demand dynamics were already being tested. The initial selloff in the Treasury market on the news was minimal, pushing 2-year and 10-year yields up by just 2-3 basis points (U.S. 10-year Treasury yield is 4.09% as of 3pm ET on February 20).
8. Refunds may introduce more near-term financing needs. Another key implication stems from the prospect of tariff refunds. Because the Court found the tariffs unlawful, many importers may now file refund claims, potentially up to $175 billion. Even if processed gradually, this creates a new near ‑term financing need for the federal government. Any meaningful issuance to bridge refund ‑related outflows would likely concentrate in the front end of the curve, steepening it modestly.

That’s where we see things now, but this situation is fluid. We will continue to bring updates as more information becomes available.

Jeff Buchbinder, CFA, provides the top-down view of the stock market for LPL Financial Research. He has over 25 years of experience in equities.

Important Disclosures

This material is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. There is no assurance that the views or strategies discussed are suitable for all investors. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, please consult your financial professional prior to investing.

Investing involves risks including possible loss of principal. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee return or eliminate risk.

Indexes are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Index performance is not indicative of the performance of any investment and does not reflect fees, expenses, or sales charges. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results.

This material was prepared by LPL Financial, LLC. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however LPL Financial makes no representation as to its completeness or accuracy.

Unless otherwise stated LPL Financial and the third party persons and firms mentioned are not affiliates of each other and make no representation with respect to each other. Any company names noted herein are for educational purposes only and not an indication of trading intent or a solicitation of their products or services.

Asset Class Disclosures –

International investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and political instability and may not be suitable for all investors. These risks are often heightened for investments in emerging markets.

Bonds are subject to market and interest rate risk if sold prior to maturity.

Municipal bonds are subject and market and interest rate risk and potentially capital gains tax if sold prior to maturity. Interest income may be subject to the alternative minimum tax. Municipal bonds are federally tax-free but other state and local taxes may apply.

Preferred stock dividends are paid at the discretion of the issuing company. Preferred stocks are subject to interest rate and credit risk. They may be subject to a call features.

Alternative investments may not be suitable for all investors and involve special risks such as leveraging the investment, potential adverse market forces, regulatory changes and potentially illiquidity. The strategies employed in the management of alternative investments may accelerate the velocity of potential losses.

Mortgage backed securities are subject to credit, default, prepayment, extension, market and interest rate risk.

High yield/junk bonds (grade BB or below) are below investment grade securities, and are subject to higher interest rate, credit, and liquidity risks than those graded BBB and above. They generally should be part of a diversified portfolio for sophisticated investors.

Precious metal investing involves greater fluctuation and potential for losses.

The fast price swings of commodities will result in significant volatility in an investor's holdings.

This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial LLC.

Not Insured by FDIC/NCUA or Any Other Government Agency | Not Bank/Credit Union Deposits or Obligations | Not Bank/Credit Union Guaranteed | May Lose Value

For Public Use – Tracking: #1068512

A message from Advisor Perspectives and VettaFi: Discover something new! Click here to register for our upcoming webcasts.

Read more commentaries by LPL Financial