Why the 60/40 Portfolio Needs a New Playbook

For most of the last four decades, the 60/40 portfolio did exactly what it promised. Stocks climbed, bonds offset the losses when they didn't, and advisors could build client portfolios around a reliably predictable balance.

Key Takeaways:

  • The 60/40 portfolio struggles when inflation is high and stocks and bonds fall at the same time.
  • Managed futures can diversify a portfolio by performing well when both stocks and bonds decline.
  • Options income ETFs can boost yield for clients who need cash flow, from retirees to younger investors.

That balance is now under strain. Persistent inflation, geopolitical shocks, and a growing need for income have exposed the limits of the traditional model in ways that don't look temporary.

Two recent interviews shed light on what advisors can do about it. David Aspell and Gerald Prior of Mount Lucas Management make the case that most portfolios are diversifying with the wrong tools. Meanwhile, Mike Khouw, chief strategist at YieldMax ETFs, argues that the income side of the portfolio needs a fundamental rethink as well.

Their approaches differ, but they are working on the same core problem.