The Dollar Bounced. Foreign Markets Didn't Flinch

On the surface, last week looked engineered to embarrass our positioning. The dollar index climbed to a six-week high above 99.3 by Friday and finished the week roughly flat at those levels. The ten-year Treasury yield punched higher to 4.56%, gold drifted back to roughly $4,520 — about 4.5% below where it closed two weeks earlier — and the S&P 500 booked its eighth consecutive weekly advance, the longest such streak since 2023. The macro narrative coming out of the April CPI release, the renewed US-Iran headlines, and Friday's swearing-in of Kevin Warsh as Federal Reserve chair was thoroughly hawkish, thoroughly pro-dollar, and on every casual read, not friendly to a portfolio tilted toward international diversification. And yet, beneath that headline tape, the foreign markets we have argued the case for all year did something we believe is worth far more attention than the day-to-day moves in the dollar. They held their ground. The MSCI EAFE basket finished within striking distance of a 52-week high. The Stoxx Europe 600 advanced and Japanese equities continued the multi-year reflation that has carried the Nikkei to multi-decade highs. That cross-current is the real story of the week — and, in our view, the one with the most important investment implication.



Read more: The Cost of Being Too Liquid

The reason the dollar rallied is straightforward. The April CPI release on May 12 came in at 0.6% month-over-month and 3.8% year-over-year, the hottest headline print since May 2023 and a half-percentage-point acceleration from March. Energy alone was up 17.9% over twelve months and accounted for more than 40% of the headline gain, but the rotation into shelter — up 0.6% on the month after several softer prints — made clear that the inflation pulse is not a pure tariff-and-tankers story. Retail sales on Thursday rose 0.5% in nominal terms but went modestly negative in real terms once inflation was netted out. The thirty-year Treasury briefly traded above 5.1% on May 15, its highest level in nearly a year. Markets, which only two weeks earlier had been pricing the possibility of a cut later in the year, are now pricing a meaningful chance of a rate hike before December. The dollar's bid is mechanical: hot inflation plus a more hawkish Fed reaction function pulls in foreign capital looking for nominal yield. That logic, narrowly applied to last week's tape, is correct.



What is less examined in the consensus read is what that bid is costing the United States in real time. Real ten-year Treasury yields above 2.1% combined with thirty-year yields above 5% are restrictive enough to bite. Mortgage rates have risen materially over the past month. April retail sales were dragged lower by furniture, autos, department stores, and clothing — the rate-sensitive and discretionary categories that respond first when real rates move. Consumer sentiment readings released through May sit near historic lows. We do not think the US economy is on the verge of recession — we have been explicit on that point all year — but we do think the market is currently asking the Federal Reserve, under brand-new leadership, to deliver a meaningful real-rate squeeze on the consumer in order to break a CPI line being pushed higher partly by tariffs and partly by an Iran-related energy shock that may already be on the path to resolution. That is a difficult ask, and not one we believe the policy mix can sustain through the second half of the year without consequence.



We owe readers an explicit acknowledgment of what is working in the United States. Consumer balance sheets, as we have written before, remain healthy in aggregate. The Q1 productivity print at 2.9% year-over-year confirms that the AI-driven capex cycle is genuinely lifting the productive frontier of the US economy — not merely the multiples of a handful of technology stocks. The S&P 500's eighth straight weekly gain, closing Friday at 7,473, reflects an investor base that sees these strengths and is willing to underwrite them. We are not in the business of denying that. Our positioning is not a recession bet, and our case for diversification has never depended on a US downturn. It depends on something different: the structural likelihood — not inevitability — that the marginal foreign holder of US dollar assets will increasingly demand a wider risk premium for concentration in a single currency block, a single regulatory regime, and a single fiscal trajectory.